判决理由
Misuse of private information constitutes a tort. Damages for distress can be awarded under the Data Protection Act without the need to prove financial loss.
事实
Google collected browsing data through Safari browsers without users' consent. Claimants sought damages for distress caused by the breach of their privacy.
判决摘要
The Court of Appeal held that misuse of private information is a tort, and that the DPA 1998 allows claims for distress without proof of financial loss, contrary to the literal interpretation.
关键引述
"Compensation for distress under the DPA should be available without proof of pecuniary loss."
— Lord Dyson MR
后续处理
Applied
Applied under UK GDPR for distress-only data protection claims.