免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Family Law
House of Lords
2006

Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane

[2006] UKHL 24

判决理由

The three principles governing ancillary relief on divorce are: needs, compensation (for relationship-generated disadvantage), and sharing (of the fruits of the matrimonial partnership). Non-matrimonial property may be treated differently from matrimonial property.

事实

Two appeals were heard together. Miller involved a short childless marriage to a wealthy man. McFarlane involved a long marriage where the wife gave up a lucrative career to raise children.

判决摘要

The House of Lords identified three strands justifying financial awards: needs, compensation for relationship-generated disadvantage, and equal sharing of matrimonial assets. In Miller, the short marriage limited the sharing claim. In McFarlane, the wife's career sacrifice justified a substantial award.

关键引述

"The rationale of the sharing principle is that marriage is a partnership of equals... when the partnership ends, each is entitled to an equal share of the assets of the partnership."

Lord Nicholls

后续处理

Good law

The three-strand approach (needs, compensation, sharing) is now the standard framework for ancillary relief.