衡平法与信托
明示、推定和拟制信托,受托人义务和衡平法救济。
简介
衡平法通过提供禁令和特定履行等灵活救济来补充普通法。
核心原则
Three Certainties — An express trust requires certainty of intention (the settlor must intend to create a trust — Knight v Knight [1840]), certainty of subject matter (the trust property must be identifiable — Palmer v Simmonds [1854]), and certainty of objects (the beneficiaries must be ascertainable — McPhail v Doulton [1971]).
Constitution of Trusts — A trust must be properly constituted by transferring legal title to the trustee, or by the legal owner declaring themselves trustee. Equity will not assist a volunteer (Milroy v Lord [1862]), though the 'every effort' principle (Re Rose [1952]) and the unconscionability approach (Pennington v Waine [2002]) provide exceptions.
Resulting Trusts — Arise automatically where (1) an express trust fails or leaves a surplus (automatic resulting trust) or (2) one person pays for property in another's name without intending a gift (presumed resulting trust, though now less favoured in the domestic context — Pettitt v Pettitt [1970]).
Constructive Trusts — Imposed by law to prevent unconscionable conduct. Key categories include: common intention constructive trusts in the family home (Lloyds Bank v Rosset [1991]), trusts arising from a specifically enforceable contract, and the institutional constructive trust (Keech v Sandford [1726] — a fiduciary who profits from their position holds the profit on trust).
Fiduciary Duties — Trustees and other fiduciaries (directors, agents, solicitors) owe duties of loyalty, including the no-conflict rule and the no-profit rule (Boardman v Phipps [1967]). These duties are strictly applied.
Breach of Trust — Where a trustee acts in breach of the terms of the trust or their fiduciary duties, beneficiaries can claim equitable compensation, an account of profits, or proprietary remedies. Trustees may rely on defences including the Limitation Act 1980 (s.21), consent of beneficiaries, or s.61 Trustee Act 1925 (honest and reasonable conduct).
Tracing — Equity allows beneficiaries to follow trust property into the hands of third parties and into substitute assets. Equitable tracing can follow money through mixed funds (Re Hallett's Estate [1880]; Foskett v McKeown [2001]). The 'lowest intermediate balance' rule limits recovery where trust funds have been dissipated.
Charitable Trusts — Must be exclusively charitable within the meaning of the Charities Act 2011 (s.3: prevention of poverty, education, religion, health, arts, amateur sport, human rights, environmental protection, and other purposes beneficial to the community). Unlike private trusts, charitable trusts benefit from the cy-près doctrine and are exempt from the beneficiary principle.
关键法规
Trustee Act 1925
Trustee Act 2000
Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996
Charities Act 2011
Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009
重要判例
McPhail v Doulton
[1971] AC 424
Boardman v Phipps
[1967] 2 AC 46
Foskett v McKeown
[2001] 1 AC 102
Pennington v Waine
[2002] EWCA Civ 227
常见情景
Trustee invests trust money in their own business
This breaches the no-conflict and no-profit rules (Keech v Sandford; Boardman v Phipps). The beneficiaries can claim an account of profits (any gains made by the trustee belong to the trust) and/or equitable compensation for any loss. The trustee may also face removal.
Parent leaves money 'for my children equally' in a will
This is likely a valid express trust if the three certainties are satisfied. 'For my children equally' shows intention and (probably) certainty of objects. If the will fails to identify specific property or children adequately, the trust may fail and the property will fall into residue or pass on intestacy.
Charity's purposes become impossible to fulfil
Under the cy-près doctrine (Charities Act 2011, ss.67–68), if the original charitable purpose becomes impossible, impracticable, or the funds exceed what is needed, the court or Charity Commission can redirect the funds to a similar charitable purpose, provided a general charitable intent can be shown.
Money given to a friend to hold for a specific purpose
This may create a Quistclose trust (Barclays Bank v Quistclose [1970]) — a resulting trust where money is advanced for a specific purpose and must be returned if that purpose fails. The lender retains a beneficial interest, giving them priority over the recipient's general creditors in insolvency.