SponsoredBuild your website with Vincony

Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. Legislation and case law change. Always consult a qualified solicitor for your specific situation.

UK Law Reference
All Cases
Insolvency & Restructuring Law
House of Lords
1998
England & Wales

Re BCCI (No 8)

[1998] AC 214

Independent editorial summary — not the official judgment. Read the full judgment via the source link.

Ratio Decidendi

A bank has a valid charge over a customer's deposits with the bank itself as security for the customer's liabilities. This is not inconsistent with the principle that a person cannot owe a debt to themselves.

Facts

BCCI had taken charges over its own customers' deposits as security for loans. On BCCI's insolvency, the liquidators challenged these charges.

Judgment Summary

The House of Lords upheld the charges. A bank can take a charge over its own customer's credit balance to secure the customer's liabilities. The charge operates as a flawed asset arrangement.

Key Quotes

"A charge by a customer over his own credit balance is conceptually possible and commercially convenient."

Lord Hoffmann

Subsequent Treatment

Applied

Applied in subsequent banking security cases.