Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. Legislation and case law change. Always consult a qualified solicitor for your specific situation.

All Cases
Drug Regulation Law
Court of Appeal
1971

R v Marriott

[1971] 1 WLR 187

Ratio Decidendi

Possession of a controlled drug requires proof that the defendant had a substance in their possession and knew it was a controlled drug, or was wilfully blind to that fact.

Facts

The defendant was found with traces of cannabis on a penknife. He argued he did not know the substance was cannabis.

Judgment Summary

The Court of Appeal held that possession requires knowledge that the substance is a controlled drug. Mere possession of a container is not sufficient without knowledge of its contents being a controlled drug.

Key Quotes

"A person has possession if he knows that the thing he possesses is a controlled drug."

Lord Widgery CJ

Subsequent Treatment

Applied

Applied in subsequent drug possession cases.