SponsoredBuild your website with Vincony

Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. Legislation and case law change. Always consult a qualified solicitor for your specific situation.

UK Law Reference
All Cases
Administrative Law
Court of Appeal
1995
England & Wales

R v Somerset County Council, ex parte Fewings

[1995] 1 All ER 513

Independent editorial summary โ€” not the official judgment. Read the full judgment via the source link.

Ratio Decidendi

Public bodies can only do what they are lawfully authorised to do. Unlike private individuals, they have no general freedom of action โ€” they must point to a specific power authorising their actions.

Facts

Somerset County Council owned Over Stowey Customs Common, which it held under statutory powers (s.120(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972, empowering the acquisition and management of land 'for the benefit, improvement or development of their area'). A majority of councillors, objecting to deer hunting on moral and animal-welfare grounds, voted to ban the hunting of deer with hounds on the council's land. Members of the local hunt challenged the resolution by judicial review.

Judgment Summary

The Court of Appeal held that the council's ban was unlawful because the council had not directed itself to the correct statutory question. A local authority is not a private landowner free to act as it pleases; it may exercise its powers over its land only for the statutory purpose for which the power is given โ€” here, whether a ban was 'for the benefit, improvement or development of their area' under s.120(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972. The majority (Bingham MR and Swinton Thomas LJ) held that the councillors had banned hunting on the basis of their own ethical objections to cruelty rather than by reference to the statutory purpose, and so had taken into account an irrelevant consideration and failed to address the relevant one; the decision was quashed. Laws J, at first instance, had captured the underlying principle that a public body has no private-law freedom of action and holds its powers as duties owed to the public, exercisable only for proper statutory purposes. The case is a classic illustration of the principle of legality and of the distinction between the position of public bodies and private individuals.

Key Quotes

"A public body has no heritage of legal rights which it enjoys for its own sake; at every turn, all of its dealings constitute the fulfilment of duties which it owes to others."

โ€” Laws LJ

Subsequent Treatment

Good law

Important authority distinguishing the legal position of public bodies from private individuals.