Constructive Dismissal vs Unfair Dismissal
Both are claims in the Employment Tribunal, but they arise in different circumstances. Understanding which applies to your situation is essential before filing an ET1.
Overview
Unfair dismissal and constructive dismissal are frequently confused. Unfair dismissal applies where the employer actively dismisses the employee โ the question is whether the dismissal was procedurally and substantively fair. Constructive dismissal is where the employee resigns in response to a repudiatory breach of contract by the employer โ the question is whether the employer's conduct was serious enough to justify resignation. Both claims are brought in the Employment Tribunal under the Employment Rights Act 1996, and both require two years' continuous service (unless the reason is automatically unfair).
Side-by-Side Comparison
Unfair Dismissal
Pros
- Straightforward where the employer has clearly dismissed โ no need to prove a repudiatory breach
- Employer must show a potentially fair reason (capability, conduct, redundancy, SOSR, statutory restriction)
- Compensation includes basic award (like redundancy pay) and compensatory award (up to ยฃ115,115 for 2025/26)
- Reinstatement or re-engagement is also available as a remedy (rarely ordered in practice)
Cons
- Requires 2 years' continuous service (unless automatically unfair reason applies)
- Employer may have followed a fair procedure even if the dismissal was unfair in substance
- Compensatory award is subject to reduction for contributory fault and Polkey reduction
Best For
Employees who have been told they are dismissed (including dismissed for redundancy) and believe there was no fair reason or the procedure was flawed.
Constructive Dismissal
Pros
- Available where the employer has not formally dismissed but has made the employment untenable
- Covers serious failures: removing pay, demoting without consent, bullying, failure to address harassment, changing role fundamentally
- If successfully argued, the employee is treated as dismissed and can claim unfair dismissal
- Also gives rise to a claim for wrongful dismissal (contractual damages)
Cons
- Much harder to prove than unfair dismissal โ must show a clear repudiatory breach
- Employee must resign promptly โ delay (affirmation of the breach) will defeat the claim
- Employer can argue the resignation was for other reasons
- No income during the period between resignation and tribunal โ financial risk is higher
Best For
Employees in situations of sustained harassment, bullying, unlawful demotion, serious breach of the implied duty of trust and confidence, or where the employer has unilaterally varied a fundamental contractual term.
Key Differences
Our Recommendation
If you have been told you are dismissed, bring an unfair dismissal claim. If you resigned because of your employer's conduct, you may have a constructive dismissal claim but must act quickly โ do not delay resigning once the repudiatory breach has occurred, and do not delay in contacting ACAS and a solicitor. In practice, many constructive dismissal claims also include discrimination or whistleblowing allegations, which do not require two years' service and should always be considered.