Section 21 vs Section 8 Eviction Notice
The difference between a no-fault Section 21 notice and a fault-based Section 8 notice for landlords seeking possession.
Overview
There are two main routes by which a landlord can seek possession of a property let under an assured shorthold tenancy (AST) governed by the Housing Act 1988. Section 21 (the 'no-fault' route) does not require the landlord to prove any wrongdoing by the tenant. Section 8 (the 'fault-based' route) requires the landlord to establish one or more statutory grounds for possession. Both routes ultimately require a court order to physically evict a tenant. Note: Section 21 is expected to be abolished under the Renters' Rights Bill.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Section 21 Notice (No-Fault Possession)
Pros
- No need to prove any fault or breach by the tenant
- Faster possession via the accelerated possession procedure (no hearing required if no defence)
- Landlord does not need to attend court if using the accelerated procedure
- Court fee relatively modest (currently £391 for accelerated procedure)
Cons
- Strict technical requirements — deposit must be protected, prescribed information served, How to Rent guide given, EPC and gas safety certificate provided; any failure makes the notice invalid
- Cannot be served in the first 4 months of the tenancy; minimum 2 months' notice
- Cannot be served as a retaliatory response to a complaint about property condition (Deregulation Act 2015, s.33)
- Expected to be abolished — the Renters' Rights Bill proposes removing s.21 entirely
Best For
Landlords who simply want the property back without asserting fault, particularly at end of a fixed term. Increasingly precarious given pending abolition.
Section 8 Notice (Fault-Based Possession)
Pros
- Will survive abolition of Section 21 — the primary route under the Renters' Rights Bill reforms
- Mandatory grounds (e.g. Ground 8 — 2 months' arrears) entitle the landlord to possession as of right if proved
- Can be served at any point during the tenancy
- Grounds for antisocial behaviour (Ground 14) and domestic abuse (Ground 14A) allow possession more quickly
Cons
- Must specify the correct ground(s) — technical errors invalidate the notice
- Disputed grounds require a full possession hearing (judge decides whether ground is made out)
- Tenant has defences: paying arrears below the threshold before hearing (defeats Ground 8 alone); disrepair set-off; counterclaim
- Court process can be slow and contested
Best For
Cases involving genuine rent arrears (Ground 8: 2 months; Ground 10: some arrears; Ground 11: persistent arrears), breach of tenancy conditions, or antisocial behaviour.
Key Differences
Our Recommendation
Landlords should be aware that Section 21 may be abolished imminently. Build familiarity with Section 8 grounds and ensure rent arrears are documented precisely. Tenants facing a Section 21 notice should check the validity requirements rigorously — an invalid notice gives them more time. Tenants facing Section 8 should seek advice from Shelter or Citizens Advice immediately, particularly if the notice cites Ground 8 (mandatory).