Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Administrative & Public Law
House of Lords
1985

Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service

[1985] AC 374

Ratio Decidendi

The exercise of prerogative powers is subject to judicial review on the same grounds as statutory powers (illegality, irrationality, procedural impropriety), unless the subject matter is non-justiciable.

Ffeithiau

The Minister banned trade union membership at GCHQ without prior consultation. The unions challenged the decision, arguing breach of legitimate expectation.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The House of Lords held that prerogative powers are reviewable in principle, establishing the three grounds of judicial review: illegality, irrationality, and procedural impropriety. However, the national security justification in this case overrode the legitimate expectation.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"Judicial review has I think developed to a stage today when one can conveniently classify under three heads the grounds upon which administrative action is subject to control by judicial review."

Lord Diplock

Triniaeth ddilynol

Leading Authority

The foundational classification of grounds of judicial review still used today.