Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Contract Law
House of Lords
1915

Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd

[1915] AC 79

Ratio Decidendi

A contractual clause fixing a sum payable on breach is enforceable as liquidated damages if it is a genuine pre-estimate of the loss likely to be suffered. If the sum is extravagant and unconscionable, it is a penalty and unenforceable.

Ffeithiau

Dunlop supplied tyres to New Garage under an agreement that the garage would not sell them below list price. For each breach, the garage would pay £5 per tyre. New Garage sold tyres below list price.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

Lord Dunedin set out guidelines for distinguishing liquidated damages from penalties. The £5 per tyre was held to be a genuine pre-estimate of loss, not a penalty, and was therefore enforceable.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"The essence of a penalty is a payment of money stipulated as in terrorem of the offending party; the essence of liquidated damages is a genuine covenanted pre-estimate of damage."

Lord Dunedin

Triniaeth ddilynol

Modified

The Supreme Court in Cavendish Square Holding v Makdessi [2015] replaced the 'genuine pre-estimate' test with a broader test of whether the clause is out of all proportion to any legitimate interest of the innocent party.