Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Energy Law
Supreme Court
2016

NATS v Heathrow Airport Ltd

[2016] UKSC 39

Ratio Decidendi

Contractual risk allocation provisions will be interpreted according to their natural meaning. A party may be entitled to recover charges even where the underlying cause of the expenditure lies elsewhere in the supply chain.

Ffeithiau

A dispute arose about charges between NATS (air traffic control) and Heathrow Airport. The underlying issue concerned how costs were allocated following major infrastructure works.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The Supreme Court interpreted the contractual provisions according to their ordinary meaning. The case illustrates the importance of clear drafting in infrastructure and energy supply contracts.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"The contract is clear and must be given effect according to its terms."

Lord Sumption

Triniaeth ddilynol

Applied

Cited in energy supply and infrastructure contract disputes.

Related Content

Related Legislation