Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Procurement Law
Court of Appeal
2019

Ocean Outdoor UK Ltd v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC

[2019] EWCA Civ 1642

Ratio Decidendi

A services concession contract (where the operator takes the operating risk) is not a public services contract but may still be subject to lighter-touch procurement requirements. The key question is whether the operator takes the demand risk.

Ffeithiau

Ocean Outdoor challenged the council's award of an advertising concession to a competitor. The question was whether the contract was a services concession (subject to lighter rules) or a services contract (subject to full procurement).

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The Court of Appeal held this was a services concession. The operator took the risk of demand for advertising space. The council had conducted an appropriate process for a concession contract.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"The essential characteristic of a concession is that the operator takes the operating risk. If the risk remains with the contracting authority, it is a services contract."

Coulson LJ

Triniaeth ddilynol

Followed

Clarifies the distinction between service contracts and concessions.

Related Content