Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Contract Law
Queen's Bench Division
1968

Partridge v Crittenden

[1968] 1 WLR 1204

Ratio Decidendi

An advertisement in a periodical stating a price for goods is an invitation to treat, not an offer for sale, unless the language clearly indicates otherwise.

Ffeithiau

Partridge placed an advertisement in a magazine reading 'Bramblefinch cocks, bramblefinch hens, 25s each'. He was charged with unlawfully 'offering for sale' a wild bird contrary to the Protection of Birds Act 1954.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The Divisional Court held that the advertisement was an invitation to treat, not an offer for sale. Applying Fisher v Bell, the distinction between offers and invitations to treat was fundamental. The conviction was quashed.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"I think that when one is dealing with advertisements and circulars, unless they indeed come from manufacturers, there is business sense in their being construed as invitations to treat and not offers for sale."

Lord Parker CJ

Triniaeth ddilynol

Good law

Consistently cited authority on advertisements as invitations to treat.