Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Social Housing
Supreme Court
2017

R (Poshteh) v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC

[2017] UKSC 36

Ratio Decidendi

Whether a person is vulnerable for the purposes of priority need under the homelessness legislation requires comparison with an ordinary person if made homeless, not with an ordinary person generally.

Ffeithiau

An asylum seeker with mental health difficulties was refused priority need status. The authority compared his vulnerability to that of an ordinary person, not an ordinary homeless person.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The Supreme Court clarified the comparator for assessing vulnerability under s.189(1)(c) Housing Act 1996: the question is whether the applicant would be significantly more vulnerable than an ordinary person who is homeless.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"The comparison should be with an ordinary person if made homeless, not with an ordinary person."

Lord Neuberger

Triniaeth ddilynol

Applied

Applied in all subsequent vulnerability assessments under homelessness legislation.