Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Prison & Parole
House of Lords
2009

R (James) v Secretary of State for Justice

[2009] UKHL 22

Ratio Decidendi

The detention of a prisoner beyond their tariff period is only justified under Article 5(1)(a) ECHR if there remains a causal connection between the original conviction and the continued detention. The state must provide reasonable opportunities for rehabilitation.

Ffeithiau

Prisoners serving IPP sentences had passed their tariff dates but were not released because they had not been given access to courses needed to reduce their risk. They challenged the lawfulness of their continued detention.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The House of Lords held that whilst Article 5 was not breached on the facts, the state was under a duty to make reasonable provision for IPP prisoners to have the opportunity to demonstrate they were safe for release.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"The state is under a duty to provide prisoners with a reasonable opportunity to rehabilitate themselves."

Lord Brown

Triniaeth ddilynol

Applied

Led to further litigation on IPP prisoner rights and eventually the abolition of the IPP sentence.