Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Prison & Parole
Supreme Court
2013

R (Osborn) v Parole Board

[2013] UKSC 61

Ratio Decidendi

Common law fairness requires the Parole Board to hold an oral hearing whenever fairness to the prisoner requires one. The Board must not adopt an unduly restrictive approach to directing oral hearings.

Ffeithiau

Three prisoners challenged Parole Board decisions made on paper without oral hearings. They argued that fairness required an oral hearing before their cases could be properly determined.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The Supreme Court held that the Parole Board must hold oral hearings whenever fairness requires them. Important factual issues that cannot be resolved on the papers, or issues of credibility, will normally require an oral hearing.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"The common law duty of procedural fairness does not stand still. It requires the Board to hold oral hearings whenever fairness to the prisoner requires one."

Lord Reed

Triniaeth ddilynol

Leading Authority

Led to significant increase in Parole Board oral hearings.