Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Gambling & Betting Law
House of Lords
2005

R v Goldstein; R v Rimmington

[2005] UKHL 63

Ratio Decidendi

The common law offence of public nuisance requires that the nuisance materially affects the reasonable comfort and convenience of a class of the public. It is relevant to gambling law where unlicensed gambling activities create public nuisance.

Ffeithiau

Two cases were joined, both involving the scope of the common law offence of public nuisance. The principles apply to unlicensed gambling operations affecting a community.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The House of Lords clarified the elements of public nuisance: it must affect a class of the public, and the defendant's act must cause common injury.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"An act or omission which materially affects the reasonable comfort and convenience of life of a class of Her Majesty's subjects is a public nuisance."

Lord Bingham

Triniaeth ddilynol

Applied

Applied in regulatory contexts including gambling enforcement.

Related Content

Related Legislation