Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Tort Law
House of Lords
1988

Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority

[1988] AC 1074

Ratio Decidendi

Where there are multiple possible causes of the claimant's injury, the burden remains on the claimant to prove on the balance of probabilities that the defendant's breach was a cause. Material increase in risk is not equivalent to material contribution to injury.

Ffeithiau

A premature baby was given excess oxygen by a junior doctor who negligently inserted a catheter into a vein instead of an artery. The baby developed retrolental fibroplasia (blindness). However, there were several possible causes of the condition, only one of which was excess oxygen.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The House of Lords ordered a retrial. The trial judge had applied the wrong test by treating material increase in risk as equivalent to material contribution. With multiple possible causes, the claimant still needed to show on the balance of probabilities that excess oxygen caused the condition.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"A plaintiff must prove not only negligence or breach of duty, but that such fault caused or materially contributed to his injury."

Lord Bridge

Triniaeth ddilynol

Good law

Distinguished from Bonnington Castings (cumulative cause) and from Fairchild v Glenhaven (mesothelioma exception). Key authority on standard causation requirements.