Civil Evidence and Procedure
Evidence rules in civil litigation under English law — hearsay (Civil Evidence Act 1995), expert evidence (CPR Part 35), disclosure (Standard, Issues-based, Model), witness statements (CPR Part 32), without prejudice privilege, and legal professional privilege.
Cyflwyniad
Civil evidence and procedure in England and Wales is governed primarily by the Civil Procedure Rules 1998, the Civil Evidence Act 1995 (which abolished the strict hearsay rule), and a body of common-law privilege doctrines. Unlike criminal proceedings, the civil burden of proof is the balance of probabilities, hearsay is generally admissible (with notice), and the court has wide case-management powers to control the volume and form of evidence. The Disclosure Pilot (Practice Direction 51U), which became permanent in October 2022, replaced 'standard disclosure' with a tiered system of Models A-E to control disproportionate disclosure costs in business and property courts. Expert evidence is gate-kept by CPR Part 35 — permission of the court is required, the expert's primary duty is to the court (not the instructing party), and joint experts are encouraged for smaller claims. Privilege — legal advice privilege (lawyer/client communications for the purpose of legal advice) and litigation privilege (communications with third parties for the dominant purpose of litigation) — protects communications from disclosure. Without prejudice privilege protects settlement negotiations.
In Brief
Civil evidence rules in England and Wales are governed by the Civil Procedure Rules and the Civil Evidence Act 1995. Hearsay is generally admissible (with notice). Expert evidence requires court permission (CPR Part 35). Disclosure in business and property courts now uses tiered Models A-E (PD 57AD, formerly the Disclosure Pilot). Trial witness statements must follow PD 57AC. Legal advice privilege protects lawyer-client communications; litigation privilege protects third-party communications where litigation is reasonably contemplated.
Egwyddorion craidd
Hearsay — Civil Evidence Act 1995: admissible in civil proceedings (s.1) subject to notice requirements (s.2). Weight is for the court.
Disclosure (general) — CPR Part 31 (county and family courts); Practice Direction 51U / 57AD in the Business and Property Courts (the Disclosure Pilot now permanent).
Disclosure Models — Model A (no disclosure), B (limited), C (request-based), D (narrow standard), E (wide search-based). Tiered to proportionality.
Expert evidence — CPR Part 35: court permission required; expert's primary duty is to the court (r.35.3); written reports + joint statements; concurrent evidence ('hot tubbing') common in heavy cases.
Witness statements — CPR Part 32 + PD 57AC for trial witness statements in Business and Property Courts. Must be in witness's own words; comply with statement of truth.
Without prejudice privilege — bona fide settlement negotiations are protected from disclosure (Rush & Tompkins v GLC [1989] 1 AC 1280). Exceptions include unambiguous impropriety and to evidence the fact (not content) of negotiations.
Legal professional privilege — two limbs: legal advice (lawyer/client; legal context required); litigation (third-party communications; dominant purpose of litigation reasonably contemplated or active).
Costs budgeting — CPR Part 3.12-3.18 + PD 3E. Multi-track cases on the standard regime must file Precedent H budgets; cost recovery is generally capped at the approved budget.
Statudau allweddol
Civil Evidence Act 1995
Civil Procedure Rules 1998
Senior Courts Act 1981
Limitation Act 1980
Achosion arweiniol
Rush & Tompkins Ltd v GLC
[1989] 1 AC 1280
Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No 5)
[2003] QB 1556
Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No 6)
[2004] UKHL 48
Director of the SFO v Eurasian Natural Resources Corp
[2018] EWCA Civ 2006
Polanski v Condé Nast Publications Ltd
[2005] UKHL 10
Frequently Asked Questions
Is hearsay admissible in civil proceedings?
Yes. The Civil Evidence Act 1995 s.1 abolished the rule against hearsay in civil cases. The hearsay can be admitted, but you must serve a hearsay notice under s.2 if you intend to rely on it without calling the witness. The weight is for the court — and the absence of the witness for cross-examination obviously reduces the weight (s.4).
What is the difference between legal advice and litigation privilege?
Legal advice privilege protects confidential communications between lawyer and client (or in-house counsel acting as lawyer) made for the purpose of giving or receiving legal advice. It is narrow — Three Rivers (No 5) limits 'client' for in-house purposes to a specific group authorised to seek the advice. Litigation privilege is wider but only available once litigation is reasonably in prospect (Three Rivers No 6) — it covers communications with third parties (e.g. expert witnesses, investigators) where the dominant purpose is the conduct of that litigation.
What is the Disclosure Pilot (now PD 57AD)?
It's the disclosure regime in the Business and Property Courts (replacing CPR Part 31 in those courts). Five Disclosure Models (A-E) allow parties and the court to scale the disclosure exercise to the value and complexity of the dispute. Model B is the most common 'limited disclosure'; Model D is the broadest and most resource-intensive. The aim is to control the disproportionate cost of full-search standard disclosure in large commercial cases.
Can without-prejudice communications ever be admitted?
Yes, in narrow exceptions: unambiguous impropriety (e.g. blackmail), to evidence that settlement was reached / its terms, to determine whether negotiations resulted in agreement, on costs (Calderbank offers / Part 36), and to rectify a settlement obtained by misrepresentation. The general rule is robust — courts strongly protect settlement discussions to encourage early resolution.
Official Resources
What To Do Next
Get Professional Help