免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Human Rights
Supreme Court
2014

P v Cheshire West and Chester Council; P and Q v Surrey County Council

[2014] UKSC 19

判决理由

A person is deprived of liberty for the purposes of Article 5 ECHR if they are under continuous supervision and control and are not free to leave, regardless of the purpose of the placement, the relative normality of the living arrangements, or whether the person is compliant or lacks capacity to object.

事实

Three individuals who lacked capacity were placed in care arrangements. The question was whether their living arrangements constituted a deprivation of liberty requiring authorisation.

判决摘要

The Supreme Court held that the 'acid test' for deprivation of liberty is: (1) is the person subject to continuous supervision and control? and (2) is the person free to leave? The purpose and relative comfort of the placement are irrelevant.

关键引述

"A gilded cage is still a cage."

Lady Hale

后续处理

Good law

The 'acid test' is the standard for deprivation of liberty in care settings; led to a massive increase in DoLS applications.