SponsoredBuild your website with Vincony

免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

UK Law Reference
所有案例
Tort Law
House of Lords
1964

Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd

[1964] AC 465

判决理由

A duty of care can arise in respect of negligent misstatements causing pure economic loss where there is a 'special relationship' between the parties — that is, the defendant assumed responsibility for the accuracy of the statement and the claimant reasonably relied on it.

事实

Hedley Byrne, an advertising agency, asked their bankers to obtain a credit reference on Easipower Ltd from Easipower's bankers, Heller & Partners. Heller gave a favourable reference but added a disclaimer. Easipower went into liquidation and Hedley Byrne suffered financial loss.

判决摘要

The House of Lords held that in principle a duty of care could arise for negligent misstatements causing economic loss where there was a special relationship. However, Heller's disclaimer was effective and they were not liable on the facts. The case established the principle of liability for negligent misstatement.

关键引述

"Where there is a relationship equivalent to contract, there is a duty of care. The respondents assumed responsibility for their reply and the appellants relied upon it."

Lord Morris

"If someone possessed of a special skill undertakes to apply that skill for the assistance of another person who relies upon such skill, a duty of care will arise."

Lord Morris

后续处理

Good law

Foundational authority on negligent misstatement liability. Developed by Caparo v Dickman [1990] and applied in Henderson v Merrett Syndicates [1995].

Related Content