免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Tort Law
House of Lords
1997

Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd

[1997] AC 655

判决理由

Only a person with a proprietary interest in land can sue in private nuisance. Interference with television reception by a building is not actionable in nuisance.

事实

Residents near Canary Wharf Tower complained that the building interfered with their television reception. Some claimants were licensees without proprietary interests.

判决摘要

The House of Lords held that only those with proprietary interests could sue in private nuisance — mere occupiers or licensees could not. Furthermore, the erection of a building that blocks TV signals is analogous to blocking a view, which is not actionable.

关键引述

"An action in private nuisance will only lie at the suit of a person who has a right to the land affected."

Lord Goff

后续处理

Good law

Leading authority on standing in private nuisance and the non-actionability of interference with TV signals.