免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Defamation & Privacy
Court of Appeal
2005

Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc

[2005] QB 946

判决理由

A defamation action can be struck out as an abuse of process where the publication is so limited that no real or substantial tort has been committed (the 'Jameel abuse' principle). The game must be worth the candle.

事实

Mr Jameel sued over an online article published by Dow Jones. Evidence showed the article had been accessed only five times in England and Wales, three of which were by his own associates.

判决摘要

The Court of Appeal struck out the claim as an abuse of process. The extent of publication within the jurisdiction was so small that no real or substantial tort had been committed. Continuing the proceedings would be disproportionate.

关键引述

"If the claimant has suffered no real or substantial tort, the game is not worth the candle."

Lord Phillips MR

后续处理

Applied

Widely applied as the 'Jameel abuse' doctrine. Now supplemented by the s.1 Defamation Act 2013 serious harm requirement per Lachaux.