免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Coroners & Inquests
House of Lords
2004

R (Middleton) v West Somerset Coroner

[2004] UKHL 10

判决理由

Where Article 2 ECHR is engaged (deaths in state custody or involving state responsibility), an inquest must examine not just how (by what means) the deceased died, but in what circumstances, including the broader question of systemic failings.

事实

A prisoner committed suicide in prison. The coroner directed the jury that they could only investigate 'how' (by what means) the death occurred, not the broader circumstances.

判决摘要

The House of Lords held that in Article 2 cases, 'how' must be interpreted as 'by what means and in what circumstances'. The jury could return a narrative verdict addressing systemic failings.

关键引述

"The word 'how' in section 11(5)(b)(ii) must be interpreted as meaning not simply 'by what means' but 'by what means and in what circumstances'."

Lord Bingham

后续处理

Leading Authority

Established the 'Middleton inquest' for Article 2 cases.