免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Criminal Law
Queen's Bench Division
1884

R v Dudley and Stephens

(1884) 14 QBD 273

判决理由

Necessity is not a defence to murder. The deliberate killing of an innocent person to preserve one's own life is murder, even in the most extreme circumstances of survival.

事实

Four crew members of the yacht Mignonette were shipwrecked in the South Atlantic. After 20 days adrift with no food or water, Dudley and Stephens killed the cabin boy, Richard Parker (who was ill and close to death), and the three survivors fed on his body until rescued four days later.

判决摘要

Lord Coleridge CJ held that necessity was no defence to murder. The defendants were convicted of murder but sentenced to death, which was commuted to six months' imprisonment by the Crown.

关键引述

"It must not be supposed that in refusing to admit temptation to be an excuse for crime it is forgotten how terrible the temptation was."

Lord Coleridge CJ

后续处理

Followed

Remains the leading authority that necessity cannot be a defence to murder (confirmed in Re A (Children) [2001] for conjoined twins).

Related Content

Related Cases