判决理由
Following the abolition of mandatory corroboration warnings by the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, it remains open to a judge to give a warning about the reliability of a witness where appropriate, but such warnings are discretionary, not mandatory.
事实
Appeals were heard concerning the proper approach to corroboration warnings after the 1994 Act abolished the mandatory requirement.
判决摘要
The Court of Appeal held that judges retain discretion to warn about unreliable witnesses but are no longer required to give mandatory corroboration warnings for complainants in sexual offences or accomplice evidence.
关键引述
"It is a matter for the judge's discretion what, if any, warning he considers appropriate in respect of such a witness."
— Lord Taylor CJ
后续处理
Standard authority on the discretionary corroboration warning post-1994 Act.