免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Property Law
Court of Chancery
1848

Tulk v Moxhay

(1848) 2 Ph 774

判决理由

A restrictive covenant (negative obligation) attached to land can be enforced against subsequent purchasers who take the land with notice of the covenant, in equity.

事实

Tulk sold a garden in Leicester Square to Elms, who covenanted to maintain it as a garden. The land passed through several hands until it was purchased by Moxhay, who intended to build on it. Moxhay had notice of the covenant.

判决摘要

Lord Cottenham LC held that equity would enforce the restrictive covenant against Moxhay because he had taken the land with notice of it. It would be inequitable to allow him to disregard the covenant.

关键引述

"If an equity is attached to the property by the owner, no one purchasing with notice of that equity can stand in a different situation from the party from whom he purchased."

Lord Cottenham LC

后续处理

Good law

Foundation of the law of restrictive covenants in land law. The rules have been developed by subsequent cases and now require registration under the Land Registration Act 2002.