Cross-Examination
The questioning of a witness by the opposing party's advocate after examination-in-chief. Its purpose is to challenge the witness's evidence, credibility, or reliability. Leading questions are permitted in cross-examination.
Independent editorial summary — not the official statute text. Read the official version on legislation.gov.uk.
The Ministry of Justice's own Civil Procedure Rules glossary gives the concise official definition: cross-examination is 'Questioning of a witness by a party other than the party who called the witness.' It is deliberately defined against its counterpart, 'evidence in chief' — 'The evidence given by a witness for the party who called him' — because the two stages serve opposite purposes: one side draws out the witness's account, the other tests it.
In criminal trials, cross-examination is handled with particular care where the witness is vulnerable, such as a child. CPS guidance on video-recorded evidence notes that where a young witness views their recorded interview separately from the jury, best practice (drawing on the Equal Treatment Benchbook) is that 'the young witness should be sworn immediately before cross-examination and then asked if they have watched the video recorded interview and if its contents are true' — an example of how procedure adapts the basic right to challenge a witness's evidence to the witness's own needs.
Related terms
Official sources
This explanation is drawn from the official sources below; every substantive statement is verified against them. For advice on a specific matter, see our find help page.